After Nearly 20 Years, Blizzard Straps on DRM

August 18, 2009


These days, nothing seems to strain the relationship between developers and gamers like digital rights management. But when your customers are as infatuated with your work as the millions who've been drooling over Blizzard Entertainment's Starcraft sequel, I guess you're willing to risk it, especially if your parent company is Activision.

That's right, after almost 20 years of shipping consistently tight, expertly crafted strategy blockbusters and online juggernauts, Blizzard is adding DRM to its repertoire, starting with Starcraft 2.

Mindful that intrusive DRM can cool the ardor of even the most devoted fans, Blizzard promises a lightweight scheme that will only require users to connect to Blizzard's servers once and sign up for a Battle.net account.

In an interview with Incgamers, which broke the news, VP of game design Ron Pardo notes that "piracy really historically has not been that bid of a deal for us." Though there have been a few examples, Pardo said that "for the most part we can shut down those services."

But if Blizzard's combination of fan loyalty and savvy use of online components to boost the value of buying a game spare it the ravages of theft, why the move to DRM?

The tongue-in-cheek answer to that question rests with Blizzard parent Activision and its Papa Smurf, Bobby Kotick. After bemoaning piracy rates for Call of Duty 4, Activision seems to have gotten much more serious about copy protection. And with chief Kotick publicly wishing for even higher game prices, the publisher is going to need some protection from outraged gamers and their pirate backlash.

Buzz It



       


GameCulture Shout Box

Posted 07/03/10 at 12:44pm
ZippyDSMlee: lets see dragon age,bioshock fallout 3....mmmmmmm I need another 7 games :P
Posted 06/30/10 at 10:14pm
JulieGray: @SimonBob - Lol yup, very easy to think of the top 10 games that sucked :P
Posted 06/30/10 at 11:15am
SimonBob: I doubt I could do a "top 10 top 10 lists list" but I could certainly conjure up a bottom 10 of the worst.
Posted 06/24/10 at 08:18am
ZippyDSMlee: oh wait report it in the forums right? LOL
Posted 06/24/10 at 07:44am
ZippyDSMlee: spam in ze used game article.
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:15pm
ZippyDSMlee: be nice but I guess thats for the next huge site overhaul.
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:14pm
ZippyDSMlee: <p>Kay, so back to no links but my page url is not blocked...but I can do links on GPs site 0-o consistency in the sites would</p>
Posted 06/23/10 at 10:01pm
JulieGray: I deleted that old profile. @Simonbob and Zippy - try commenting now please. Thanks
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:38pm
ZippyDSM: Is its to much work to whitelist I understand but just saying it should not be hard to white list peeps.
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:36pm
ZippyDSM: Bug the forums for this issue as well?
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:35pm
ZippyDSM: Yes I know I got 2 frikkin logins I forgot...who do I bug to get this one deleted?
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:34pm
ZippyDSM: just saying you need to tweak the spam filter by letting staff/editors/writers,ect whitelist people that are flaged as spam
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:30pm
JulieGray: <p>Alot of spam these days uses links to obscure and sometimes virus infested websites so that's why the filter blocks links. If you want to discuss please refer to the forum, thanks!</p> <br />
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:29pm
JulieGray: @ Zippy - yes I know that Zippy, I was explaining what the spam module does dude not pointing fingers... :/
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: Just havign a link in your sig dose not eman you are spam, trying to force advert something off topic is spam.
Posted 06/23/10 at 05:28pm
JulieGray: Ok so I looked at the spam module filters and if you add links or have links in your sig you 're spam lol
Posted 06/23/10 at 04:44pm
JulieGray: So yeah it def wasn't intentional to stop you guys from posting links or w/eva :P
Posted 06/23/10 at 04:41pm
JulieGray: Please read this thread on the spam thing http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?p=126678#post126678
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:58am
ZippyDSMlee: Why not que the post for modertion then add users by name so their posts are let threw without having to ok it manaully?
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:57am
ZippyDSMlee: Ya the spam filter just taged me as well 0-o
Login or register to post shouts