Success Killed the Videogame Star

December 22, 2009


It became a punchline for the decade: Where's Duke Nukem Forever? The "game" won so many vaporware awards that it became old the third time. But why did 3D Realms ever let it get to that point and how did the game that seemed to have such promise finally spell the demise for its prominent developer?

Wired Magazine took an in-depth look at 3D Realms and their franchise face to find out what went wrong. Co-founders George Broussard and Scott Miller refused to talk for the story because of a pending lawsuit against 3D Realms for failure to deliver the game. But Wired was able to piece together on-the-record and anonymous chats with former employees to get a pretty detailed look at the game and the inner workings of the company, and a virtual timeline leading up to the implosion.

From the article:

Ironically, the end was within reach, even if Broussard couldn’t see it. Raphael van Lierop, who was hired in 2007 as a creative director, was given several pieces of the game to play. It took him about five hours. Broussard was stunned; he’d thought those levels would take half that time to get through. “You could see the gears turning, with him thinking, ‘Oh wow — maybe we’ve got more game than we think,’” says van Lierop. Broussard had been staring at the game for so long, he’d lost perspective.

Van Lierop was excited: From what he’d seen of it, Duke Nukem Forever was so well developed — and so graphically superior to any other game in production — that if 3D Realms pushed hard for a year, they could release it and “blow everyone out of the water.” No, no, Broussard replied. It was two years out. Van Lierop was stunned. “I thought, ‘Wow, how many times have you been here, near the finish line, and you thought you were way out?’”

The story is incredibly well researched and offers a better picture of what happened. The ending offers some speculation on the future of the franchise:

Many observers think Take-Two is attempting to bleed 3D Realms dry until it has no more cash, then convince a judge to force Broussard and Miller to hand over intellectual-property rights to the Duke Nukem franchise to repay the $2.5 million advance. “It’s an IP grab,” says one Dallas-area developer. If Take-Two actually secured the rights to Duke Nukem, it might likely throw out the by-then-aging Duke Nukem Forever and simply hire new developers to produce new Duke games. But even without the suit, there is only a short window for Duke Nukem Forever to come out in its current form before it will have to be revised yet again, to keep pace with changing technology.

With Take-Two facing many of its own financial woes, the conclusion may not be far-fetched.

(Image courtesy Wired Magazine and Olly Moss)

Buzz It



       


GameCulture Shout Box

Posted 07/03/10 at 12:44pm
ZippyDSMlee: lets see dragon age,bioshock fallout 3....mmmmmmm I need another 7 games :P
Posted 06/30/10 at 10:14pm
JulieGray: @SimonBob - Lol yup, very easy to think of the top 10 games that sucked :P
Posted 06/30/10 at 11:15am
SimonBob: I doubt I could do a "top 10 top 10 lists list" but I could certainly conjure up a bottom 10 of the worst.
Posted 06/24/10 at 08:18am
ZippyDSMlee: oh wait report it in the forums right? LOL
Posted 06/24/10 at 07:44am
ZippyDSMlee: spam in ze used game article.
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:15pm
ZippyDSMlee: be nice but I guess thats for the next huge site overhaul.
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:14pm
ZippyDSMlee: <p>Kay, so back to no links but my page url is not blocked...but I can do links on GPs site 0-o consistency in the sites would</p>
Posted 06/23/10 at 10:01pm
JulieGray: I deleted that old profile. @Simonbob and Zippy - try commenting now please. Thanks
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:38pm
ZippyDSM: Is its to much work to whitelist I understand but just saying it should not be hard to white list peeps.
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:36pm
ZippyDSM: Bug the forums for this issue as well?
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:35pm
ZippyDSM: Yes I know I got 2 frikkin logins I forgot...who do I bug to get this one deleted?
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:34pm
ZippyDSM: just saying you need to tweak the spam filter by letting staff/editors/writers,ect whitelist people that are flaged as spam
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:30pm
JulieGray: <p>Alot of spam these days uses links to obscure and sometimes virus infested websites so that's why the filter blocks links. If you want to discuss please refer to the forum, thanks!</p> <br />
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:29pm
JulieGray: @ Zippy - yes I know that Zippy, I was explaining what the spam module does dude not pointing fingers... :/
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: Just havign a link in your sig dose not eman you are spam, trying to force advert something off topic is spam.
Posted 06/23/10 at 05:28pm
JulieGray: Ok so I looked at the spam module filters and if you add links or have links in your sig you 're spam lol
Posted 06/23/10 at 04:44pm
JulieGray: So yeah it def wasn't intentional to stop you guys from posting links or w/eva :P
Posted 06/23/10 at 04:41pm
JulieGray: Please read this thread on the spam thing http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?p=126678#post126678
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:58am
ZippyDSMlee: Why not que the post for modertion then add users by name so their posts are let threw without having to ok it manaully?
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:57am
ZippyDSMlee: Ya the spam filter just taged me as well 0-o
Login or register to post shouts